Okay, so all comments I made before the entire story was revealed were almost entirely wrong (though I was right in that it wasn't a Big Fat Coming Out article). I still say that tweet was weird and premature, though. Couldn't let the article speak for itself, Mark Wossname? Had to jump the gun there? Though ZQ's blog post was amazing, and I think the better place (vs. the magazine article) to get across (at least some of) what was behind his decision. Obviously, the magazine interview was done weeks if not months ago. It would seem that the interview was done very recently. Maybe he came out to his family during the reunion in Texas, and so was ready to come out in the press? Or maybe that's too private to speculate on.
Can I say that it feels kind of weird to celebrate? Like, I feel like a bad fan for not jumping up and down and posting flaily gifs all over the place, but... I don't know where I was going with that. It's just a thing, a thing we kind of already knew and pretended didn't matter. Low-key celebration, maybe? A couple of guys in party hats quietly waving little rainbow flags? Maybe one of them has one of those unfurling party honkers that goes "TWEEEEEEEEE"? Or maybe I'm wrong (again) and we should all just go apeshit with joy. :oD Either way, I'm good to go.
It is a happy day.
Can I say that it feels kind of weird to celebrate? Like, I feel like a bad fan for not jumping up and down and posting flaily gifs all over the place, but... I don't know where I was going with that. It's just a thing, a thing we kind of already knew and pretended didn't matter. Low-key celebration, maybe? A couple of guys in party hats quietly waving little rainbow flags? Maybe one of them has one of those unfurling party honkers that goes "TWEEEEEEEEE"? Or maybe I'm wrong (again) and we should all just go apeshit with joy. :oD Either way, I'm good to go.
It is a happy day.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-16 05:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-16 05:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-16 05:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-16 05:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-16 05:20 pm (UTC)At any rate, it's an important interview as a whole!! XD
no subject
Date: 2011-10-16 05:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-16 05:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-16 05:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-16 05:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-16 05:35 pm (UTC)When you posted that other post earlier today I went and checked out ontd_pinto and now I read this post and have no idea whether he came out himself or not bc you're kinda unclear about it. But to be honest, I'm not that big of a stalker that I would break out the googlefu to check. I'm totally with bbutercup there... while I might squee about it being "true" as opposed to "merely fangirl thinking", I feel bad about how it got out and how an artist as multifarious as Zach will likely have to deal with crap about his sexual orientation instead of just do is art.
geeeez, I never meant to ramble on like that, s'cuse me. ;)
no subject
Date: 2011-10-16 05:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-16 05:44 pm (UTC)And, yeah, it's a shame that he's going to be reduced to his orientation, at least for the first few months. Hopefully the buzz around that particular item will die down as his career moves forward.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-16 05:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-16 05:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-16 06:06 pm (UTC)kind of like how we all know that, someday, Pinto will walk again...
no subject
Date: 2011-10-16 06:19 pm (UTC)"In a world... where the Star Trek sequel kept getting delayed... and the writers just couldn't get their fucking act together... In 2012... Pinto WILL walk again."
no subject
Date: 2011-10-16 10:50 pm (UTC)I still feel weird celebrating too. I'm all very much for "yay, go ZQ!" as it was an incredible thing to do. But I still feel somewhat sad he's had to compromise his previous position as a general human being rather than a ~merely gay one. I also think he'd like to try and keep things as low key as the interview itself was. Still, each to their own I guess. I can't criticise anyone.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-17 03:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-16 11:21 pm (UTC)i get hwy he did it (assuming he did it for the reasons he states), and that's admirable. i appreciate that it's a big decision for him, and he's done it classily. but... i don't know that i can celebrate someone having to state their sexual preferences in a national magazine.
i realize it's a stage we have to go through to get to the point where it's a non-starter, but that doesn't mean i have to like it. lol.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-17 03:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-17 12:04 am (UTC)Anyway, Zach was, as always, very classy and articulate, and i'm proud of him.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-17 03:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-17 12:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-17 03:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-17 12:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-17 03:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-17 01:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-17 03:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-17 05:54 am (UTC)...let's not do the party honkers. or should we? his sense of humor is amazing and weird. he might actually appreciate it with a special hipster sense of irony.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-17 06:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-17 08:02 am (UTC)